Analysis Area 1: Detail the impact and cost/benefit of Iowa Department of Corrections’ (IDOC) revocation-reduction efforts on public safety by determining how violations, revocations, and offending patterns by people on community supervision changed during the pandemic and estimating the impact of that change on public safety. The cost/benefit of the revocation-reduction efforts will be assessed by working with IDOC to estimate a cost of the revocation-reduction efforts in terms of staffing, caseloads, and other related costs, then balancing those costs against the impact on public safety.
Update: CSG Justice Center staff presented descriptive findings on revocations, violations, caseloads, officer/client contacts, hearings, client interventions/programming, and disproportionality in race and ethnicity representation for the overall CBC population in person to the Oversight Committee in Des Moines on June 2. CSG Justice Center staff also continued conversations with a contracted research consultant and IDOC research staff to verify our understanding of the data that were shared by IDOC and to develop our research plan and tasks in anticipation of the final presentation of findings and recommendations in October. Following the June presentation, CSG Justice Center staff began exploring crime and arrest trends prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic using several public data sources in preparation for the final presentation that will focus on public safety outcomes. CSG Justice Center staff also continued to build out an analytic file that will be used to develop and run statistical models to explore the relationship between revocation reductions and public safety in the case-level IDOC data, as well as disaggregate key metrics by supervision type, race and ethnicity, risk level, supervision level, and criminal history for subgroup analysis. Finally, CSG Justice Center staff continued adding to and maintaining a website to compile descriptive findings, data visualizations, and pertinent notes on data interpretation, limitations, and next steps.
Analysis Area 2: Evaluate the implementation of recent IDOC efforts to reduce revocations; estimate their impact on community-based corrections officers’ ability to supervise effectively, case management activities, officer and supervisee needs, and utilization of community-based services and programs; and identify which efforts to keep (and which to adjust or modify).
Update: CSG Justice Center staff presented themes from the Community Supervision Assessment during the second Oversight Committee presentation, including results from the survey of 270 supervision officers on their resource needs across districts. CSG Justice Center staff also began drafting recommendations for Iowa stakeholders to consider during the final presentation in October.
Analysis Area 3: Connect with criminal justice stakeholders (law enforcement, courts, community-based corrections, etc.) and review available data to better understand larger criminal justice responses and changes implemented in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Update: CSG Justice Center staff also convened focus groups with members from the Iowa Victims Advisory Council to discuss project findings, learn about the impact of the pandemic on victims, and solicit recommendations for improving the success of clients on community-based corrections. CSG Justice Center staff continued to summarize the themes across the focus groups with county attorneys, county sheriffs, chiefs of police, and reentry stakeholders. CSG Justice Center staff also continued engaging criminal justice stakeholders by convening the second Oversight Committee meeting and connecting with IDOC staff and CBC judicial district directors shortly after the presentation.
Press Clips:
- https://csgjusticecenter.org/2022/06/21/iowa-oversight-committee-on-jus…
Research Monthly Status:
CSG Justice Center staff presented descriptive findings on revocations, violations, caseloads, officer/client contacts, hearings, client interventions/programming, and disproportionality in race and ethnicity representation for the overall CBC population in person to the Oversight Committee in Des Moines on June 2. Also, CSG Justice Center staff continued conversations with a contracted research consultant and IDOC research staff to verify our understanding of the data that were shared by IDOC and to develop our research plan and tasks in anticipation of the final presentation of findings and recommendations in October. Finally, CSG Justice Center staff continued adding to and maintaining a website to compile descriptive findings, data visualizations, and pertinent notes on data interpretation, limitations, and next steps.
Research Monthly Log:
• 6/22: Call with Sarah Fineran (IDOC Director) and Sharee Lind (IDOC data specialist) to discuss the CSG Justice Center’s approach to creating an analytic data file using violations data and criminal history data. They clarified some terminology and ultimately affirmed the approach we were taking to joining and cleaning data.
• 6/30: Following the presentation, CSG Justice Center staff began exploring crime and arrest trends prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic using several public data sources in preparation for the final presentation that will focus on public safety outcomes. CSG Justice Center staff also continued to build out an analytic file that will be used to develop and run statistical models to explore the relationship between revocation reductions and public safety in the case-level IDOC data, as well as disaggregate key metrics by supervision type, race and ethnicity, risk level, supervision level, and criminal history for subgroup analysis. During the next month, CSG Justice Center staff will finalize projections of revocation trends exclusively using pre-COVID onset data. Using ARIMA models, CSG Justice Center staff will be able to project the trend of revocations using pre-March 2020 data and then compare this projection to the actual post-March 2020 decline. In addition, staff will continue to share data files with the research consultant and meet with IDOC to review research findings as the focus shifts from descriptive analysis to more statistically robust research exploring the relationship between revocation-reduction efforts and public safety outcomes.
Please check the box next to the following questions if the answer is 'yes'.
Please enter the applicable Event Date if there is an Event associated with this TTA.
When entering an Event Date, the Time is also required.
If the TTA is targeted to a particular audience or location, please complete the questions below.
Milestones are an element, activity, work product, or key task associated with completing the TTA (e.g. kick-off meeting, collect data from stake holders, deliver initial data analysis).
Please complete the fields below, if applicable, to create a milestone for this TTA.
Please respond to the Performance Metrics below. The Performance Metrics questions are based on the TTA Type indicated in the General Information section of the TTA.
Please submit a signed letter of support from your agency’s executive or other senior staff member. The letter can be emailed to or uploaded with this request. The letter should be submitted on official letterhead and include the following information:
- General information regarding the request for TTA services, i.e., the who, what, where, when, and why.
- The organizational and/or community needs specific to the request for TTA services.
- The benefits or anticipated outcomes from the receipt of TTA services.
By submitting this application to BJA NTTAC, I understand that upon approval of this application for TTA, the requestor agrees to keep BJA NTTAC informed of any circumstances that may impact the delivery of the TTA, including changes in the date of the event, event cancellation, or difficulties communicating with the assigned TTA provider.
Please call [site:phone] if you need further assistance completing this application.